<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for syslog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://syslog.tv/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://syslog.tv</link>
	<description>ramblings of an administrator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Automatic/Unattended updates on Debian 6 (Squeeze) by Kura</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2012/01/28/automaticunattended-updates-on-debian-6-squeeze/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Kura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=809#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I like fluid designs. A bunch of designers I know (and work with) dislike fluid but I think it&#039;s &#039;cos they&#039;re shitty designers. 

That being said, I only modified this theme, I didn&#039;t make it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I like fluid designs. A bunch of designers I know (and work with) dislike fluid but I think it&#8217;s &#8216;cos they&#8217;re shitty designers. </p>
<p>That being said, I only modified this theme, I didn&#8217;t make it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Automatic/Unattended updates on Debian 6 (Squeeze) by marcusklaas</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2012/01/28/automaticunattended-updates-on-debian-6-squeeze/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>marcusklaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=809#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Nice page dude.. I like the design of it all. It&#039;s fluid unlike 95% of the blogs. I freaking hate fixed-width pages. I have widescreen. Most of time I can only use 50% of the area because of 800px wide designs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice page dude.. I like the design of it all. It&#8217;s fluid unlike 95% of the blogs. I freaking hate fixed-width pages. I have widescreen. Most of time I can only use 50% of the area because of 800px wide designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Kura</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>Kura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-860</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting issue. Can you try disabling the DKIM filtering and just send an email to sa-test@sendmail.net and show me the results you get from that?

I sometimes notice that DKIM and DK mess with each other, signing each others signatures which means the content is incorrectly signed but

&lt;blockquote&gt;DAEMON_OPTS=&quot;-l -o X-DomainKeys,DomainKey-Signature&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

and

&lt;blockquote&gt;DAEMON_OPTS=&quot;-l -o DKIM-Signature,X-DKIM&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

should stop that from happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting issue. Can you try disabling the DKIM filtering and just send an email to <a href="mailto:sa-test@sendmail.net">sa-test@sendmail.net</a> and show me the results you get from that?</p>
<p>I sometimes notice that DKIM and DK mess with each other, signing each others signatures which means the content is incorrectly signed but</p>
<blockquote><p>DAEMON_OPTS=&#8221;-l -o X-DomainKeys,DomainKey-Signature&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>and</p>
<blockquote><p>DAEMON_OPTS=&#8221;-l -o DKIM-Signature,X-DKIM&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>should stop that from happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Sumo</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Hi! I followed step by step this tutorial on my Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS server, and when I’m sending emails I got the following errors:
First of all, in mail.log says:
&lt;code&gt;dkim-filter: no signature data
dk-filter: bad signature&lt;/code&gt;
And I sent mail to sa-test@sendmail.net, and got the following email:
&lt;code&gt;Authentication System:       DomainKeys Identified Mail
   Result:                   DKIM signature confirmed GOOD
   Description:              Signature verified, message arrived intact
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net        
   More information:         http://mipassoc.org/dkim/
   Sendmail milter:          https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/

Authentication System:       Domain Keys         
   Result:                   DK signature confirmed BAD
   Description:              Signature verification failed, message may have been tampered with or corrupted
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net        
   More information:         http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
   Sendmail milter:          https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/

Authentication System:       Sender ID           
   Result:                   SID data confirmed GOOD
   Description:              Sending host is authorized for sending domain
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net        
   More information:         http://www.microsoft.com/senderid
   Sendmail milter:          https://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/

Authentication System:       Sender Permitted From (SPF)
   Result:                   SPF data confirmed GOOD
   Description:              Sending host is authorized for sending domain
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net        
   More information:         http://spf.pobox.com/&lt;/code&gt;
So, I&#039;m a little confused... can you help to resolve the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I followed step by step this tutorial on my Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS server, and when I’m sending emails I got the following errors:<br />
First of all, in mail.log says:<br />
<code>dkim-filter: no signature data<br />
dk-filter: bad signature</code><br />
And I sent mail to <a href="mailto:sa-test@sendmail.net">sa-test@sendmail.net</a>, and got the following email:<br />
<code>Authentication System:       DomainKeys Identified Mail<br />
   Result:                   DKIM signature confirmed GOOD<br />
   Description:              Signature verified, message arrived intact<br />
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net<br />
   More information:         <a href="http://mipassoc.org/dkim/" rel="nofollow">http://mipassoc.org/dkim/</a><br />
   Sendmail milter:          <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/</a></p>
<p>Authentication System:       Domain Keys<br />
   Result:                   DK signature confirmed BAD<br />
   Description:              Signature verification failed, message may have been tampered with or corrupted<br />
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net<br />
   More information:         <a href="http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys" rel="nofollow">http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys</a><br />
   Sendmail milter:          <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/</a></p>
<p>Authentication System:       Sender ID<br />
   Result:                   SID data confirmed GOOD<br />
   Description:              Sending host is authorized for sending domain<br />
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net<br />
   More information:         <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/senderid" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/senderid</a><br />
   Sendmail milter:          <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/" rel="nofollow">https://sourceforge.net/projects/sid-milter/</a></p>
<p>Authentication System:       Sender Permitted From (SPF)<br />
   Result:                   SPF data confirmed GOOD<br />
   Description:              Sending host is authorized for sending domain<br />
   Reporting host:           sendmail.net<br />
   More information:         <a href="http://spf.pobox.com/" rel="nofollow">http://spf.pobox.com/</a></code><br />
So, I&#8217;m a little confused&#8230; can you help to resolve the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HOWTO: Debian &#8211; Sudo(ers) explained by ravi mehtre</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2010/01/13/howto-debian-sudoers-explained/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>ravi mehtre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=60#comment-855</guid>
		<description>thanks u very much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks u very much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Kura</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Kura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Congrats for getting it working, glad to help and glad you found my article useful. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats for getting it working, glad to help and glad you found my article useful. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Bogdan</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-845</guid>
		<description>After spending many hours trying to figure out what the problem was, I managed to solve it.  I had an error in DNS zone. Now it&#039;s working perfectly. Thank you for the help and for this great tutorial. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After spending many hours trying to figure out what the problem was, I managed to solve it.  I had an error in DNS zone. Now it&#8217;s working perfectly. Thank you for the help and for this great tutorial. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Kura</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Kura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-840</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need POP3 or IMAP, those protocols are used for receiving, not for sending.

It&#039;s possibly because you&#039;re using PHP&#039;s mail() function which by default calls /usr/bin/sendmail, that being said it might be because by default the sendmail call from PHP uses the server&#039;s fully qualified domain name, which may be different than the one you have configured email to sign for. E.g. I sign email for syslog.tv but the FQDN of the mail server for that domain is heimdallr.syslog.tv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need POP3 or IMAP, those protocols are used for receiving, not for sending.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s possibly because you&#8217;re using PHP&#8217;s mail() function which by default calls /usr/bin/sendmail, that being said it might be because by default the sendmail call from PHP uses the server&#8217;s fully qualified domain name, which may be different than the one you have configured email to sign for. E.g. I sign email for syslog.tv but the FQDN of the mail server for that domain is heimdallr.syslog.tv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Bogdan</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Thank you for getting back to me. I checked the postfix user with the command you gave to me and it has the proper privileges. dk-filter and dkim-filter are both running and I also checked the postifx configuration and it is like in your tutorial. I don&#039;t have pop3 and imap servers installed, could be this a problem? I&#039;m sending test emails with classic mail() php function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for getting back to me. I checked the postfix user with the command you gave to me and it has the proper privileges. dk-filter and dkim-filter are both running and I also checked the postifx configuration and it is like in your tutorial. I don&#8217;t have pop3 and imap servers installed, could be this a problem? I&#8217;m sending test emails with classic mail() php function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Postfix + DK (DomainKeys) + DKIM + SPF on Debian 6/Ubuntu by Kura</title>
		<link>http://syslog.tv/2011/09/17/postfix-dk-dkim-spf/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Kura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://syslog.tv/?p=564#comment-838</guid>
		<description>To see if the Postfix user can read your file content use:

&lt;code&gt;sudo -u postfix cat /etc/dk/dk.key&lt;/code&gt;

Also make sure that both DK-Filter and DKIM-Filter are both running and are properly configured and also that Postfix is configured to use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To see if the Postfix user can read your file content use:</p>
<p><code>sudo -u postfix cat /etc/dk/dk.key</code></p>
<p>Also make sure that both DK-Filter and DKIM-Filter are both running and are properly configured and also that Postfix is configured to use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
